This article is part of: The Stubborn Optimist →

How do you design a gym people keep coming back to, long after the motivation fades?

Illustration SUE Behavioural Design — The Stubborn Optimist

There is a Dutch gym that worked this out and redesigned the one part everyone else ignores. SportCity Amsterdam rebuilt its entrance, not its equipment, as a community space. Table tennis, a coffee corner, benches. Members started, on their own, to organise birthdays after group classes, to meet for coffee. The gym became a community. And the social bond turned out to be the retention measure that no app could replicate.

The gym that profits from people who do not come

The conventional response to members quitting is to treat it as a motivation problem. Send encouraging messages through the app. Discount the membership in January. Hand out a personal training schedule. The logic assumes people stop coming because their motivation ran out, and that the fix is to top the motivation back up.

But motivation ebbs and flows; that is its nature, not a flaw to be fixed. The real reason people do not return after the first interruption is that nobody knows them and nobody misses them when they are absent. There is no social reason to come back. Miss a week through illness or a busy patch, and if the gym is just a room full of machines and strangers, there is nothing pulling you back in. The gym, in fact, makes its money from exactly these people, the ones who pay and do not come, which means the business model has no real incentive to solve the thing that drives them away. No volume of motivational messaging overcomes the basic absence of a social tie.

SportCity changed the social environment rather than the motivational messaging. By rebuilding the entrance as a genuine community space, with table tennis, coffee, places to sit and linger, it gave people a reason to come that survives the ebb of individual motivation: other people. Members began organising things spontaneously, birthdays, coffee meetups, because the space made connection possible. And once you are known, once someone notices when you are not there, the missed week does not become a missed month. The social bond does the retention that motivation never could.

Why this is design, not willpower

You could read SportCity as a story about a friendly gym with a nice atmosphere. But that misses the mechanism, and the mechanism is the point.

The redesigned entrance does not motivate people to keep coming by inspiring their commitment. There is no campaign urging members to stay dedicated. The returning comes from the social bond the space produces: people come back because they are known, because there is a coffee and a conversation waiting, because someone would notice their absence. The commitment is not summoned from within the individual. It is supplied by the community the environment created.

That is the difference between design and motivation, and in retention it is decisive. Motivation tries to top up a resource that naturally fluctuates, asking people to want it more, which fails the moment the wanting dips. Design changes the environment so that returning does not depend on motivation at all, because a social tie pulls people back regardless of how motivated they feel on a given evening. You cannot reliably motivate people through every dip in enthusiasm. You can build a community that brings them back when the enthusiasm is low.

The dropping out was never really about insufficient willpower. It was about a gym where nobody knew you and nobody missed you.

From behavioural science to behavioural design

Turn your instinct for progress into a method

The Behavioural Design Method gives you tools to find the friction in any situation and redesign the path. For your organisation, your team, or your own work.

Google 4.8/5 Bloomville 5 stars Springest 9.7 EQAC certified

The principle: habits run on social bonds, not solo motivation

The research underneath this is clear, and naming it turns SportCity's entrance from a nice touch into a usable principle.

Work on social identity and habit formation finds that habitual behaviour depends significantly more on social bonding than on individual motivation.[1] A habit sustained purely by personal willpower is fragile, because willpower fluctuates and depletes. A habit woven into a social context, where other people expect you, notice you, share the activity with you, is far more durable, because the social tie persists even when individual motivation dips. We are far more likely to keep doing something when our identity and our relationships are bound up in it than when it rests on solitary resolve.

This is why the social redesign outperforms the motivational app. The app addresses individual motivation, the fragile, fluctuating resource. The community addresses social bonding, the durable one. By turning the gym into a place where people are known and connected, SportCity attached the exercise habit to a social identity and a set of relationships, which is exactly what the research identifies as the thing that makes habits stick. The returning is not powered by willpower surviving every dip. It is powered by a social tie that holds steady through the dips.

The fragile gym habit was never only about weak individual resolve. It was about a habit left resting on solo motivation rather than anchored in a social bond.

There is a wider truth here that reaches far beyond gyms, and it is worth stating plainly because it runs against how we usually think about discipline. We tend to treat sticking with a hard habit as a test of character, a matter of how much willpower someone can summon. The research points somewhere less flattering to the idea of the lone, disciplined individual and more useful in practice: the people who keep up difficult habits are usually not the ones with exceptional willpower, but the ones whose habit is embedded in a social context that carries them through the low points. The runner with a running club, the learner in a study group, the gym-goer who is known at the gym. The lesson is not to try harder alone. It is to stop relying on solitary resolve and to build the social scaffolding that holds a habit up when motivation, as it always will, dips.

What you can design this week

You do not need to run a gym to apply this. The principle, that habits run on social bonds rather than solo motivation, works wherever you want a behaviour to last.

Anchor the habit in a social tie. A behaviour sustained by individual willpower is fragile; one woven into a relationship or community is durable. Wherever you want a habit to stick, ask how to attach it to other people who will notice, expect and share it.

Make people known, so absence is noticed. Much of the dropout comes from being anonymous: nobody knows you, nobody misses you. Designing an environment where people are recognised, where someone would notice their absence, creates the pull that brings them back after a gap.

Design the social space, not just the functional one. SportCity rebuilt the entrance, not the equipment. The places where people connect, linger and meet are not peripheral to the core activity; they are what makes the core activity last. Design the social layer deliberately.

Stop relying on motivation to do connection's job. This is the deeper shift. When people drop off, the reflex is to motivate them harder. The more durable move is to build the social bonds that hold a habit together through the inevitable dips in motivation. Connection outlasts willpower.

The thread is the one that runs through everything we do at SUE. You rarely sustain a behaviour by motivating people harder. You sustain it by building the social environment that holds the habit in place. SportCity did not exhort its members to stay committed. It built a community where being known brought people back, and let the social bond do what no app could.

If you want to learn how to anchor behaviour in social bonds so it survives the fluctuations of motivation, that is exactly the kind of work our Behavioural Design training is built around.

Learn Behavioural Design yourself

Start designing for behaviour, not hoping for it

The SUE Behavioural Design Method teaches you to find the friction, redesign the path, and make the right behaviour the easiest option. In two days live or at your own pace online.

Google 4.8/5 Bloomville 5 stars Springest 9.7 EQAC certified
Astrid Groenewegen - Co-founder SUE Behavioural Design
Weekly newsletter

1.5 minutes on influence

10,000+ readers  ·  Free  ·  Unsubscribe anytime