How do you design a place where newcomers feel they belong?
In Zaatari, the largest Syrian refugee camp in Jordan, which housed around a hundred and fifty thousand people at its peak, the residents spontaneously created a central market street. They named it, themselves, the Sham Elysees, a play on Damascus and the Champs-Élysées, and it stretches almost three kilometres through the camp, lined with vegetable stores, bakeries, bicycle repair shops, all run by refugees. Nobody planned it. It emerged because the human need for familiar environments is so strong that people build them anywhere. And the lesson for urban design is sharp: recognisable social structures are the fastest integration infrastructure there is.
The integration that policy cannot deliver
The conventional response to newcomers not feeling at home is to treat integration as a matter of policy and education. Language courses. Integration programmes. Cultural awareness campaigns. The logic assumes integration is something delivered through instruction and administration, that if newcomers learn the language and the rules, belonging will follow.
But integration is fundamentally an environmental question being handled as a policy one, and that mismatch is why the policy so often fails to produce belonging. Whether someone feels welcome is determined by the neighbourhood, the physical places they can go, the social rituals they can take part in, the texture of daily life, not by the completion of a programme. A person can finish every course and still feel utterly unmoored, because the environment offers them nowhere familiar to be, no recognisable social structure to inhabit. The policy addresses knowledge and compliance; belonging is produced by environment, and the two are not the same thing. Treating an environmental need with a policy instrument leaves the actual need unmet.
Zaatari demonstrates what meets it, precisely because it had no integration policy and built belonging regardless. With no plan and little money, the residents created the Sham Elysees, a market street that gave the camp the recognisable social structure of a Syrian town: a place to shop, to gather, to trade, to be among the familiar rhythms of ordinary life. This was not delivered by any programme; it emerged from the deep human need for familiar environments, which is so strong that people will build them even in a desert camp. And that self-built familiar structure did more for belonging than any integration course, because it gave people an environment they recognised and could inhabit, which is what belonging actually requires.
Why this is design, not policy
You could read the Sham Elysees as a touching story of refugee resilience. But the design lesson is general and structural, and the structure is the mechanism.
The market street does not make people feel they belong by encouraging them to embrace their new circumstances. There is no campaign urging the residents to settle in. The belonging comes from the environment providing a recognisable social structure: a familiar kind of place, a market, a high street, that people know how to inhabit, that lets ordinary social life resume. People feel at home not because they were persuaded to, but because the environment gives them somewhere familiar to be. The belonging is not exhorted. It is produced by an environment with recognisable structure.
That is the difference between design and motivation, and with integration it is decisive. Motivation, in the form of integration programmes, tries to teach people into belonging, which addresses knowledge but not the felt experience of being at home. Design provides the recognisable environment in which belonging forms on its own. You cannot reliably instruct people into feeling they belong. You can build an environment with the familiar social structures that let belonging happen, and let it follow.
The failure to feel at home was never only about a lack of language or knowledge. It was about an environment that offered no recognisable structure for ordinary social life to resume in.
Turn your instinct for progress into a method
The Behavioural Design Method gives you tools to find the friction in any situation and redesign the path. For your organisation, your team, or your own work.
The principle: place attachment and orientation
The research underneath this is well established, and naming it turns the Sham Elysees from an anecdote into a usable principle.[1]
Work on place attachment and orientation finds that people process social situations faster, and feel more settled, in environments that contain familiar elements, and that urban environments offering recognisable social structures reduce the disorientation newcomers feel. There is a deep human need to be somewhere legible, somewhere whose structure we can read and inhabit without effort. A familiar kind of place, a market street, a square, a high street, lets a newcomer orient themselves, know how to behave, find their footing, all of which are preconditions for the sense of belonging. The recognisable structure does not just please; it orients, and orientation is where belonging begins.
This is why the self-built market street did more than any programme could. The programme addresses language and rules; the market street addresses orientation and place attachment, giving people a familiar structure to inhabit. By providing a recognisable social environment, even in a refugee camp, it let people orient themselves and resume ordinary social life, which is the foundation of belonging. The lesson generalises directly to how we design neighbourhoods for newcomers anywhere: the fastest integration infrastructure is not a course but a recognisable place. Familiar structure orients; orientation enables belonging.
The disorientation and unbelonging were never only about unfamiliarity with language or rules. They were about an environment that offered no recognisable structure to orient within.
There is something quietly profound in the fact that the residents built this themselves, with no plan and almost no money, because it reveals how fundamental the need for legible environment actually is. People did not wait to be housed and then taught to belong; they immediately set about reconstructing the recognisable structure of a town, because being somewhere illegible is close to unbearable and being somewhere familiar is a precondition for everything else. The lesson for anyone designing for newcomers, in any setting, is to take that need seriously rather than treating it as a luxury to address after the practical matters. The recognisable place is not decoration laid on top of integration; it is the ground integration stands on, and people will build it for themselves if no one builds it for them, because they cannot do without it.
What you can design this week
You do not need to design a refugee camp to apply this. The principle, that recognisable structure orients and orientation enables belonging, works wherever you want newcomers to feel at home.
Provide recognisable structure. Belonging begins with orientation, and orientation comes from familiar elements. Wherever you welcome newcomers, ask whether the environment offers recognisable social structures they can read and inhabit, or whether it leaves them disoriented.
Treat belonging as environmental, not just procedural. Courses and rules address knowledge; belonging is produced by environment. Design the physical and social spaces, the places to gather, shop, and take part, that let ordinary social life resume.
Let familiar social structures do the work. A market, a square, a communal place gives people somewhere to be among others in a recognisable way. These structures integrate faster than any programme, because they provide the daily, ordinary belonging that instruction cannot.
Design for orientation first. This is the deeper shift. Before teaching newcomers the language and the rules, give them an environment they can orient within, because the disorientation of an illegible place undermines everything else. Familiar structure is the foundation belonging is built on.
The thread is the one that runs through everything we do at SUE. You rarely produce belonging by teaching people the rules. You produce it by designing an environment with recognisable structures they can inhabit. Zaatari's residents did not wait for an integration programme. They built a familiar market street, and let the recognisable place do what no policy could.
If you want to learn how to design environments with the recognisable structures that let newcomers orient and belong, that is exactly the kind of work our Behavioural Design training is built around.
Start designing for behaviour, not hoping for it
The SUE Behavioural Design Method teaches you to find the friction, redesign the path, and make the right behaviour the easiest option. In two days live or at your own pace online.
1.5 minutes on influence
10,000+ readers · Free · Unsubscribe anytime