How do you design a building where neighbours become friends by accident?
Here is an uncomfortable pattern. Loneliness is rising fastest in dense, crowded cities, exactly where people are most physically surrounded by others. We live stacked on top of each other and still do not know the person across the landing. Architects design buildings for privacy, because that is what people say they want, and the privacy quietly comes with a side effect almost nobody asked for: isolation.
People want both, rest and connection, but when the design has to choose, it chooses rest every time. So the question worth asking is how you design a building that protects privacy and still makes neighbours into friends, without anyone having to make an effort. Some Danish apartment buildings answer it with a single design move.
What the shared walkway did
The move is a covered communal gallery, a shared walkway that every resident passes along to reach their own front door.[1] You cannot come and go without travelling the same route as your neighbours, which means you meet them, again and again, by accident. Not at an organised event, not through an app, just in passing, day after day. That repeated, incidental contact is the design tool. The neighbourhood evening is not.
And residents tend to experience this not as an intrusion on their privacy but as a gift. Their home is still private. The route to it is social. The building gives them both, by separating the two rather than forcing a choice.
Why this is design, not effort
It is easy to assume the residents who become friends are the ones who made the effort. The shared-walkway buildings show how much of it is simply the route. People who would never have organised a meeting, never knocked on a door, become familiar with their neighbours purely because the building keeps placing them in the same passage at the same times. No effort of will was required. The architecture did it.
Which means turning neighbours into friends is far less about anyone's sociability and far more about whether the building makes them keep meeting.
Turn your instinct for progress into a method
The Behavioural Design Method gives you tools to find the friction in any situation and redesign the path. For your organisation, your team, or your own work.
The science: the power of passive contact
The principle here is the strength of passive contact: regular, incidental, low-stakes encounters between equals are among the strongest predictors of whether people form friendships, stronger than shared interests or compatible personalities.[2] It is not deep conversation that builds the bond at first. It is sheer repeated exposure, seeing the same face in the same place often enough that a nod becomes a greeting, a greeting becomes a chat, a chat becomes a relationship. Familiarity, built by repetition, does the early work.
This is why the communal gallery is so effective and the neighbourhood barbecue so weak. The barbecue is a single, high-effort, occasional event. The gallery delivers exactly what friendship actually grows from: small, frequent, effortless encounters, built into the route home. The building manufactures the repetition that relationships need.
Through a Behavioural Design lens: designing the encounter, not urging the effort
It is worth naming the discipline here, because the shared walkway is a clear example of designing for what cannot be willed. You cannot decide your way into knowing your neighbours; the familiarity has to accumulate through contact you mostly do not plan. Most attempts to build community ignore this and put the burden on the individual: the invitation to attend, the app to join, the effort to reach out, all of which compete with everyone's busy life and usually lose.
The communal gallery asks for no effort at all. It changes the situation so the encounters happen as a by-product of people simply going home. The behavioural design move is to stop urging people to connect and instead redesign the everyday route so that connection becomes the natural result of movements they are already making. The residents are not trying to be neighbourly. The building keeps introducing them, and familiarity does the rest.
What this means in practice
Start with the passive contact already shaping your own life. The people you feel easiest with are very often simply the ones you see most often by routine, not the ones you have made the most deliberate effort over. If there is a relationship you want to warm up, the highest-leverage move is frequency, finding small, regular, low-pressure ways to cross paths, rather than one big effortful gesture. Repetition builds warmth more reliably than intensity.
For anyone leading a team, this is a practical lever for connection and trust. Big offsites and structured team-building are the high-effort, occasional barbecue. What actually builds a team is frequent, low-stakes contact: the brief regular check-in, the shared space people pass through, the routine that keeps the same people meeting. If a team feels distant, especially a remote one, the answer is rarely a grander event. It is engineering more frequent, lighter touchpoints into the ordinary week.
And at the level of the organisation, this reframes how you think about connection across distance and structure. When the everyday passages that produce passive contact disappear, fully remote work, siloed departments, buildings designed so nobody need meet, relationships stop forming on their own and have to be deliberately re-created. The skill this teaches is to treat incidental contact as something you design into the routine, not a nice accident you hope for, because it is where trust quietly begins.
What you can design this week
You will not be adding a communal gallery, but the underlying move works on any relationship or group you want to warm up. Three ways to start:
Choose frequency over intensity. Passive contact builds warmth through repetition, not through one big effort. Engineer small, regular, low-stakes ways for people to cross paths rather than relying on the occasional event.
Build connection into the route, not on top of it. The gallery works because it is on the way home. Put the contact where people already go, a shared route, a regular touchpoint, rather than asking them to make a special effort.
Separate privacy from isolation. People want rest and connection both. Design so the private space stays private but the route to it is social, rather than letting a desire for privacy quietly produce isolation.
The Danes did not make their residents more outgoing. They built a route home that kept neighbours meeting, and let familiarity turn them into friends. That is the difference between organising connection and designing for it, and it works on a friendship, a team or a whole building.
Want to learn to read a space for what it does to the people inside it, and design it on purpose? That is the heart of our Behavioural Design training. Details on the SUE website.
Start designing for behaviour, not hoping for it
The SUE Behavioural Design Method teaches you to find the friction, redesign the path, and make the right behaviour the easiest option. In two days live or at your own pace online.
1.5 minutes on influence
10,000+ readers · Free · Unsubscribe anytime