Sustainable employability in education: redesigning the context
Teacher shortages are chronic across Europe and beyond. But when you ask teachers why they leave, salary is rarely the first answer. You hear things like: "I stopped being able to actually teach." Or: "I lost the sense that it mattered." Or simply: "I was done."
That is a context problem, and not so much a motivation issue. Context problems are solved by redesigning the context, rather than by pay rises or resilience workshops.
Sustainable employability in education requires a fundamentally different approach: design targeting the environment that structurally undermines or reinforces teacher resilience, rather than programmes targeting the individual.
Sustainable employability in education is the capacity of education professionals to remain healthy, motivated and skilled now and in the future. It requires a work context that structurally supports intrinsic motivation rather than undermining it, rather than individual willpower. More on Behavioural Design for HR →
Why teachers leave: the behavioural science explanation
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is one of the most robust frameworks in behavioural psychology. According to SDT, every person has three basic needs that fuel intrinsic motivation: autonomy (the sense that you make your own choices), mastery (the sense that you are growing in your craft) and relatedness (the sense of belonging and mattering to others).[1]
Education scores poorly on all three. Autonomy has been systematically reduced over recent decades through centralised curricula, assessment pressure and accountability bureaucracy. Mastery is under threat because teachers have less and less time for genuine professional development. And relatedness is undermined by a culture of individual performance pressure and insufficient collegial collaboration.
What follows is predictable: professionals with the strongest intrinsic motivation are the first to disengage. The work still interests them; the context erodes their motivation day by day.
Teachers leave education because the environment makes it increasingly hard to do what they are good at and care about, and not because they have stopped wanting to.
Why the standard approach does not work
The typical HR response to teacher shortages and high attrition combines three types of measure: financial incentives (salary increases, bonuses), personal development (coaching, career advice, mentoring programmes) and wellbeing interventions (mindfulness, stress management, vitality programmes).
None of these target what behavioural science identifies as the root cause: the context. This is precisely the error that behavioural scientist Kurt Lewin described in the 1940s as the Fundamental Attribution Error: we attribute behaviour to personality traits (motivation, resilience, commitment) while the situation is almost always the dominant factor.
As long as teachers spend more hours on administration than on teaching, as long as they have little say over the content and structure of their own lessons, as long as professional collaboration is an exception rather than a structure, outcomes will not change. Better working conditions help people hesitate longer before leaving. A better context gives them a reason to stay.
Mapping the behavioural forces in education
To design sustainable employability in education, you first need to understand which forces drive education professionals' behaviour. For this, we use the SUE Influence Framework, an analytical model that asks five questions about the unconscious drivers behind behaviour.[2]
When you apply this framework to education professionals, a clear pattern emerges:
Job-to-be-Done: Teachers choose education from a clear intrinsic motivation: making a difference in the development of young people. This is not only their professional goal but often a deeply personal drive. That strong JTBD makes them vulnerable: when the context makes it harder to fulfil that purpose, it strikes at the core of who they are.
Pains: The biggest pains are not the busyness itself but the sense of lost purpose. Teachers feel pain when they spend hours on administration while students wait. When they are required to account for systems that make teaching worse. When they have so little autonomy that they cannot respond to what their class actually needs.
Gains: The gains are powerful and close: the moment a student understands something, the satisfaction of a well-delivered lesson, the sense of mattering. But those gains become harder to reach when the work structure consistently gets in the way.
Comforts: Teachers stay for a long time because their JTBD is so strong. Students, collegial bonds, the rhythm of the school year, these are comforts that delay departure even when circumstances deteriorate. But comforts are not a foundation. When the pains become too great, even the strongest comfort dissolves.
Anxieties: The threshold for leaving is high due to fear: guilt towards students and colleagues, uncertainty about life outside education, the conviction that "it will not be better elsewhere." These anxieties keep teachers in place, sometimes longer than is good for them.
You've read about it. But what if you could redesign the context in your own educational organisation?
As Europe's #1 academy in Behavioural Design, we train HR professionals and leaders to analyse and redesign work contexts. Learn to apply the Influence Framework and SWAC model in your organisation.
How to design sustainable employability in education
Once the analysis clarifies which forces keep education professionals engaged or push them away, the next step is to design the context so the balance shifts. For this, we use the SWAC model: Spark, Want, Again and Can.[3]
The core insight of SWAC is that all four elements work multiplicatively. A WANT intervention (more inspiration, more motivation) does not work if CAN is zero. This is why so much education policy fails: it invests in WANT while the barriers lie in CAN.
CAN: remove barriers to doing the work well
The most powerful lever for sustainable employability in education is eliminating everything that prevents teachers from doing what they are good at. That is more concrete than it sounds.
Reducing administrative burden is a CAN intervention: fewer forms, smarter systems, AI-supported reporting. Designing timetables so that collaboration with colleagues is built in rather than dependent on individual initiative. School leaders who actively remove friction for their team rather than adding more accountability requirements. Each of these changes makes it easier to do the work well, without requiring extra motivation from people who are already motivated.
WANT: restore autonomy and mastery
Self-Determination Theory tells us that intrinsic motivation grows when people experience autonomy, mastery and relatedness. WANT interventions in education are therefore about restoring the conditions under which motivation arises from within, rather than "motivating people more".
This means: greater professional say over lesson content and teaching approach. Space for experimentation, even when things do not work immediately. Recognition of craftsmanship rather than only process conformity. And leadership that treats teachers as professional experts rather than implementers of policy.
AGAIN: make professional vitality a routine
Sustainable employability is not a state, it is a habit. That habit must be designed as a structural rhythm, not an optional activity. Think of peer supervision as a fixed part of the working week, regular colleague lesson observations, or an explicit monthly check-in between a team leader and a teacher, focused not on administration but on professional experience.
The key is that these moments cannot depend on any individual manager's goodwill. They must be designed as a structure, so they are always there, even when things are busy.
SPARK: create early signals
Teachers rarely indicate that they are struggling before it is too late. The threshold is too high: fear of judgement, feeling of failure, loyalty to students. Spark interventions are designed to lower that threshold by making early signals visible and discussable.
This can happen through a simple monthly team thermometer ("how are you feeling this month on a scale of 1 to 10?"), through a peer support structure where colleagues actively look out for each other, or through a school leader who sees it as their core task to signal and act early.
The broader framework for sustainable employability through behavioural design provides a complete guide for HR professionals who want to apply this across sectors.
Concrete steps for HR in education
How do you start as an HR professional or school leader with behavioural design for sustainable employability? These are the three most effective starting points:
1. Conduct six in-depth interviews with teachers at different career stages. Ask about behaviour, not opinion. When did someone consider leaving? What made them stay? What would mean they would never think about leaving again? The answers are the design brief for your approach.
2. Map the work context as a design problem. What percentage of working time goes to direct student contact? What to administration? Which decisions can teachers make themselves? Which cannot? Where is the most friction in daily work? This is the diagnosis that gives direction to interventions.
3. Choose one CAN intervention and implement it thoroughly. Not a broad programme, but one concrete barrier removed. Completely, consistently and measurably. Start there and build from it. Behaviour change requires evidence of effect, not ambition of reach.
Frequently asked questions about sustainable employability in education
What is sustainable employability in education?
Sustainable employability in education is the capacity of education professionals to remain healthy, motivated and skilled now and in the future. It does not require more willpower from teachers but a work context that structurally supports their intrinsic motivation rather than undermining it.
Why do teachers leave the profession?
Salary is rarely the primary reason teachers leave education. Behavioural science points to three deeper causes: loss of professional autonomy, erosion of purpose through growing administrative burden, and lack of mastery development. These are context problems, not motivation problems.
How does Behavioural Design help with sustainable employability in education?
Behavioural Design uses the SUE Influence Framework to map the forces driving education professionals' behaviour: intrinsic motivation (Job-to-be-Done), the pains of workload and lost autonomy, the gains of mastery and student contact, the anxieties around professional identity, and the comforts that delay a career switch. From those insights you redesign the work context to structurally retain teachers.
What are concrete interventions for sustainable employability in education?
Concrete interventions include: reducing administrative burden (CAN), restoring professional autonomy over lesson content and teaching approach (WANT), building collegial collaboration as a structural routine (AGAIN) and creating early conversation moments when motivation is declining (SPARK). Sustainable employability requires context design, not personal development programmes.
1.5 minutes of Influence
Read by 10,000+ professionals · Free · Unsubscribe any time